Main
Search This Site

« back to Questions Day 2
» forward to Nearing the End of the Week

Discussion Archives
Bel Canto
blindness
A Box of Matches
Bridge of Birds

a canticle for leibowitz
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Chronicle of a Death Foretold
A Confederacy of Dunces
confessions of an ugly stepsister
Coraline
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

descent into hell
The Dew Breaker
The Diamond Age
Doctor Zhivago
don quixote

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Fight Club
The Five People You Meet in Heaven
Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe

The Ghost Writer
good in bed

harry potter and the sorcerer's stone
A Home at the End of the World
House of Leaves

If on a Winter's Night a Traveler
invisible monsters

The Kite Runner

Life of Pi

memoirs of a geisha
Middlesex
Motherless Brooklyn
mysterious skin

Neverwhere
noir
Norwegian Wood

One for the Money

the poisonwood bible

revenge
Running with Scissors

The Secret Life of Bees
shopgirl
The Solitaire Mystery
The Stupidest Angel

Things Fall Apart
Thumbsucker
The Time Traveler's Wife
Troll

Veronika Decides to Die

The Wasp Factory
Watch Your Mouth
What is the What
A Wrinkle in Time
Wuthering Heights

 

July 24, 2002

The Big Connecting Deal

Okay, for today the question is going to start with one big Glossy ring around 'connect' becoming an obscenity, and some of the more obscure "how does it relate to the world" dilemmas Mary raises like the foam outside the End Zone Hotel.

One of the big deals about the world of Noir is that it's a severe dystopia: a world not simply in decline, but near collapse. The Gloss has lost its innocence, and in a big way. In that vein, whatever the syllables you speak it with, you can't really understand the word fuck, or use it properly, until you know in your gut what it means in terms of cheapening; of using-and-throwing-away, a la the "cheap-and-nastiverse" that McNihil has shut out by customizing his eyes; a la Connect 'Em Till They Bleed: Pimp-Style Management for a New Century; a la "You are well and truly connected, my friend."

...And that's the whole point: forming connections in Noir's world is a stupid, an obscene endeavor that endangers and cheapens a person. That's what makes the skin-dissolving goo outside the EZ Hotel so horrifying to November, and so titillating to the rest of the world that it commands news time, despite being a quasi-regular occurrence: it's the ultimate in obscene connection, having started with hundreds of copulating bodies, and become an embodiment of homogeneity and the untilmate in surrender and loss of self. One of the whole points of the existence of prowlers is that they keep risky connection safely at arm's length. What does it say about a culture, when it develops machines to do its "fucking"?

It's worth noting that November's introduced to us in as tawdry and debased a way as possible: her fast-forward lifestyle has forced her to make truly horrid 'connections' (in the back rooms of the Gloss's trains) to survive, and they're epitomes of just how obscene connecting can be in her world.

...And yet connection remains inevitable; Harrisch winds up forging a connection with both McNihil and November, in order to consummate his dealings around TOAW. The DZ execs were rumored to have their business-card-handshakes wired to their genitalia. The cube-bunnies survive among the cubapts through their ability to facilitate connection on all levels. And what's the point of a better audio cable, if not a more effective connection? ;-D Layers and layers.

...Which plays into the rather grisly depiction of the penalties exacted by McNihil and his fellow asp-heads for copyright infringement. The need to prosecute copyright violators so viciously arose from too much connectivity, in a way... The "all information wants to be free" attitude dances pretty close to the attitudes of the neo-hippie commune in the 747 that McNihil destroyed, too - for them 'connect' wasn't a nasty word... And look what they got!

I personally think Jeter could have done a lot more with language than focus obsessively on the change in one word's meaning, but he certainly got his mileage out of this one. Anyway, end of lecture (boy, I do go on).

On to the question: between the 'every person is an island' linguistic gymnastics and the weird narrative riffing that Jeter does, never giving a clear, unambiguous decription of some concepts or scenes (that "sight" thing again), it's telling that so much is left unclear about stuff like the Wedge after reaching the end of Noir. Is this just poor storytelling, or is Jeter doing something more interesting with "disconnected" points of view and objectivity?

-Rich



comments

hmmm.

Well, I think that it could be intentional. That is what you are getting at, I guess.

It relates to yesterday's post. Does Jeter want us to "see" what is going on in his world? Are we only seeing through a glass darkly because all of the more insidious systemic evils in the world are simply hard to pinpoint? I would like to think that he is doing it on purpose to give us the expreience that his characters are having.

Maybe.

Rich, I have a feeling that you lean towards the author trying to do something interesting. I'm not all that sure because so many things flew by me, but I'm glad we're discussing it since I'm liking finding out what I missed.

Tripp brings up a good point in asking if the author wants us to really see what's going on in the Gloss. I think his intention was for us to experience it through McNihil's noir implants but had a hard time clearly relaying that effect to the reader (and perhaps only non-sci fi readers like me). My impression is that Jeter had a complete picture of what that world was supposed to be like but was unable to effectively get it onto the pages of the book. Sloppy writing? Not necessarily. He may have intended for us to infer a lot of things and that may be the reason why I lost a lot of the story.

I relate it to the old adage: he bit off more than he could chew. I think this world is supposed to be way bigger and more layered than what’s in the book. However, Jeter might be the only one who has enough insight into it to fully understand its scope. I think we may have needed a few more details in order to be let in on what he actually intended.

The main thing I thought was sloppy was the bulleted passages. I think I got the point that each bullet was supposed to represent bits of data being processed by the character receiving the input or stimulus. Yet, these passages really bothered me. I thought a better writer would have been able to convey this idea through the use of well-written prose.

As far as the "connect" thing, I took it in a much more literal sense. I thought it had to do with the difference between being hard wired to something and going wireless. If you were connected, you were pretty much fucked because you were tied down. I didn’t get the impression that there was anything intrinsically horrid about physical contact since neither McNihil or the cube bunny didn’t appear ashamed about their coupling. He even told his wife about his past trysts. November, on the other had, had every reason to be ashamed since she was forced into prostitution in order to simply maintain her debt.

Tripp said: "I would like to think that he is doing it on purpose to give us the experience that his characters are having." I think that sounds about right. (Although I should point out, so as not to mischaracterize his comment, that Tripp followed it up with a very strongly qualifying "maybe"! ;)

I think Mary made some really interesting points about what and how much, exactly, Jeter intended for the reader to understand, and how well or how poorly he fared in following through on those intentions. I don't have the answers to the questions she raised, either -- to what extent are readers supposed to be left in the dark? or feel hopelessly "connected" themselves? and did Jeter get in over his head? etc. (I'm paraphrasing, of course) -- but they're very good, thought-provoking questions.

re: "Connecting." When I quit at the 130-page mark, I didn't see the word "connect" as having any significance outside of its service as a substitute for the word "fuck." Maybe you had to read further to understand its meaning as part of the whole "wired-in" phenomenon... or maybe I'm just dense, and it should've been more obvious from the portion I read. But every time I read the word "connect," I just said to myself, "oh, yeah -- in this world, that means 'fuck'," and I never connected it (no pun intended. No, really) to the larger "you're wired in so you'll never escape from our grasp" (?) theme.

In fact, the connected "theme" that you described in your question, Rich, never really registered with me; it never appeared as a blip on my Reader's Radar Screen. Which is just another indication that either I bailed out before giving the book the chance to get better, or that Jeter wasn't as effective as he could've (and maybe -- maybe -- should've) been in conveying his dark world to us.

Well, here goes.
Rich, I am sorry. I tried. Really, I tried. But every page felt like an assault of words...like a barrage of bugs dive-bombing at my head and buzzing in my ears. All I could do was duck and dodge and bat them away.
I simply couldn't find a way in to this. I had hoped, if I kept at it, I would find something familiar enough that I could hook into...but alas, I failed. (or gave in to exhaustion.) Maybe it's a left-brain/right-brain thing? In any case, I didn't even get as far as Jeff. Too wierd, too beyond anything I recognize, too noisy, too utterly foreign. (i live in a smaller world than y'all)

I talked (confessed) to Mary last night. She said it would be terribly funny if, suddenly, in the midst of the Don Quixote discussion, I chimed in with my view of Jeter's wierd and wacky world. So, there is hope that I may come back to it. Certainly, the intensity of your dialogue with the others has me aquamarine with envy. And (here's the part where I suck up to you 'cuz I feel wretched with guilt) you are doing a great job as moderator. I only hope I can do half as well.
oh, and Jeff? Dude. Lighten up. You're gonna ulcerate your duodenum. ; )

Barbara said: "You're gonna ulcerate your duodenum." I'm afraid you're too late, Barbara. My head went boom a long time ago. ;)

Actually, I know, I am taking this a little too seriously, aren't I? I think it's a combination of
1) the fact that I'm not working now, so in lieu of burning up brain cells at work, I'm having a tendency to (over)think this stuff
2) my guilt over not finishing this month's selection, and
3) the burden I feel for Mary's book blog to succeed when hardly any of us are participating -- which, for this month, is only exacerbated by my #2, above.

I told Mary not too long ago in an e-mail that I was concerned that I might have dominated the conversation last month, possibly discouraging others from commenting by the length of my posts and the fact that I was the first to post a few times. But I'm thinking now that wasn't the case, that apparently people just lost interest in participating.

Which is especially disconcerting considering how "easy" a read last month's book was (because it was so short), and how voluminous some of the books scheduled for upcoming months are. Even if more people don't end up chiming in, I hope that at least those of us who are don't lose interest, 'cause I think this is a good thing, and I'd like to see it keep going (and growing!).

Okay, so I got a little off-topic there. Whatever. :)

Ah well. The writing is on the wall. :-)

Seems I tend to like stuff with really aggressive verbal texturing, and in Noir's case that seems to be getting in the way, insofar as understanding or even accessing the material. A while back I busted Tripp on his blog for his jargoneering. Well it would appear the joke's on me. :-) Mea culpa.

And Jeff, please tell me you were poking fun, and that you'd never truly confuse your duodenum with anything near your head. That would make you FAR too easy a target. LOL! :-D

With regard to the whole "connecting" issue, I suppose it was pretty clear to me that connection was supposed to equal obscenity since it completely replaced fuck, and continued to be used by the characters in offensive ways, even when it seemed excessive and clunky, like "connect you, mother-connector."

And with regard to Jeter's unwillingness or inability to describe things fully or coherently, he did force us to do a lot of connecting in order to make sense of it all, didn't he?

In comic books and graphic novels (and movies and novels, but it's most obvious pictorially), the best storytelling is done in the "gutters" between pictures. If one panel shows a raised axe, and the next is a shot from outside a house showing a scream echoing from within, who's responsible for connecting those two images? The reader. It's a process called closure, and it makes us accomplices in the crime. :-)

It allows the author to say without saying, do without doing, and to engage the audience more deeply than by going the full monty with every image. IMO there's lots of that going on in Noir.

...Or perhaps I'm getting too clever in my old age. :-)

Sigh. Decrepit and barmy at 32. %-)

-Rich

Rich- authors should absolutely invite the readers to make those connections. (So I guess that makes Jeter a master mother-connector.) I want an author who expects (requires) me to work. In this case, I just didn't have any of the right tools for the job.

and Jeff, when Mary & I talked last night, I also expressed concerns about guilt, participation etc, but we're only in the 2nd round here. I think it is going well enough at this point, don't you? Can't move the furniture in till ya build the house. (?) There is a solid foundation and the rest is coming together. I mean, Mary don't truck with no slackers.

Barbara said: "(So I guess that makes Jeter a master mother-connector.)" Oooh, cheap shot... and a damn good one! I admire that in a woman. ;) (Loved your "didn't have the right tools for the job" line, too -- graphic and to-the-point!)

And Barbara, no, I'm not without hope for the book blog, far from it. Didn't mean to come off that way if I did. You're right, all the pieces are in place, and now it's mostly a matter of getting into the routine of it. It's just that it's taking longer to get up to speed than I expected (I figured I'd be "the quiet one" of the group!), and I don't want Mary to feel disappointed -- that's all.

 

Advertisements
 
 
Author:
Title:

Keyword:
Additional Features:
 First Edition
 Signed
 Dust Jacket
 Any Binding
 Hard Cover
 Soft Cover