Main
Search This Site

« back to Atwood or Hawthorne?
» forward to Discussion

Discussion Archives
Bel Canto
blindness
A Box of Matches
Bridge of Birds

a canticle for leibowitz
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Chronicle of a Death Foretold
A Confederacy of Dunces
confessions of an ugly stepsister
Coraline
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

descent into hell
The Dew Breaker
The Diamond Age
Doctor Zhivago
don quixote

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Fight Club
The Five People You Meet in Heaven
Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe

The Ghost Writer
good in bed

harry potter and the sorcerer's stone
A Home at the End of the World
House of Leaves

If on a Winter's Night a Traveler
invisible monsters

The Kite Runner

Life of Pi

memoirs of a geisha
Middlesex
Motherless Brooklyn
mysterious skin

Neverwhere
noir
Norwegian Wood

One for the Money

the poisonwood bible

revenge
Running with Scissors

The Secret Life of Bees
shopgirl
The Solitaire Mystery
The Stupidest Angel

Things Fall Apart
Thumbsucker
The Time Traveler's Wife
Troll

Veronika Decides to Die

The Wasp Factory
Watch Your Mouth
What is the What
A Wrinkle in Time
Wuthering Heights

 

September 25, 2002

Guilty as Sin

Thank you everybody for putting so much thought into this discussion. What a gifted group of writers you are. Your comments are so well stated and full of such lovely phrasing. And you play so well together. ; )

It seems there is still plenty of meat left in yesterday's comments upon which to gnaw. So continue on or...chew on this question: How do you measure guilt and sin in The Poisonwood Bible? Mary pointed out one fairly major failing: "why it took the death of a child to get Orleanna’s butt in gear." Sarah observed Orleanna's guilt and inability to forgive herself. Choose a character and name their sin. Do they feel guilty? Should they be forgiven?

Right off the bat...Rachel is a tapestry of justice. It's a women's provactive to change and yet she doesn't. She is guilty of not being moved enough by her experiences or growing more in her conciousness. And I don't forgive her. I don't think Leah does either.

Okay kids...you are on your own. I'm heading straight into the teeth of Isadore for a long weekend. I'll leave one more question for tomorrow, but I'll leave it to Mary to post. It may well be that your comments today will overlap the topic. (i wish this thing had spellcheck)



comments

Okay, let me get this one rolling...the Greek word for "sin" is amartia. It is an archery term that means "to miss the mark." So, to sin is not necessarily an intentional act of cruelty...in fact, sin seldom is that. Now, this makes sin a stickier subject than trying to discover who the asshole is.

So, let me say a little something about my opinion on Kingsolver. I think Rich has a point. Sorry, Sarah and Mary. Your influence, though strong, has not completely ruined me. ;-)

The thing is this, Kingsolver's books are about women. Not about men. The central male figures in Animal Dreams (a neglectful and emotionally unavailable father, an uneducated but loyal neredowell love interest, and a series of south-western hispanics) are never fleshed out except through the actions of their female counterparts, children etc. And, it would seem, that Kingsolver likes to weave an interesting tale. So, great heaps of woe are prerequisite. Death and meyhem abound.

So, Nathan gets to be the font for all the sin in the book. He, on some level owns it all. But since there is little time (in comparison) given to the development of the male characters, all we get is the one sided. So, I see where Rich is coming from. But the same can be said in the opposite way of most novels written about male characters. Sarah, have you read The Count of Monte Cristo yet?

I wish she had spent time fleshing Nathan out more. I know I have chapters to go yet, but the conversation thus far leads me to believe that Nathan is only one long reaction to guilt and shame. And that is a shame.

But the book ain't about him. It is about the fallout from human sin, and how well, I believe, the characters are able to perceive and follow the leadings of God.

And, maybe, they are not looking for God.

Um...I guess I killed conversation.

Tripp, you didn't kill the conversation. I'd get into this, but I'm too tired to put together complete thoughts. Plus, I spend so much time with kids who know nothing that I'm becoming more illiterate by the minute.

 

Advertisements
 
 
Author:
Title:

Keyword:
Additional Features:
 First Edition
 Signed
 Dust Jacket
 Any Binding
 Hard Cover
 Soft Cover