Main
Search This Site

« back to Lists of Bests
» forward to Gender Bias and Literature

Discussion Archives
Bel Canto
blindness
A Box of Matches
Bridge of Birds

a canticle for leibowitz
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Chronicle of a Death Foretold
A Confederacy of Dunces
confessions of an ugly stepsister
Coraline
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

descent into hell
The Dew Breaker
The Diamond Age
Doctor Zhivago
don quixote

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Fight Club
The Five People You Meet in Heaven
Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe

The Ghost Writer
good in bed

harry potter and the sorcerer's stone
A Home at the End of the World
House of Leaves

If on a Winter's Night a Traveler
invisible monsters

The Kite Runner

Life of Pi

memoirs of a geisha
Middlesex
Motherless Brooklyn
mysterious skin

Neverwhere
noir
Norwegian Wood

One for the Money

the poisonwood bible

revenge
Running with Scissors

The Secret Life of Bees
shopgirl
The Solitaire Mystery
The Stupidest Angel

Things Fall Apart
Thumbsucker
The Time Traveler's Wife
Troll

Veronika Decides to Die

The Wasp Factory
Watch Your Mouth
What is the What
A Wrinkle in Time
Wuthering Heights

 

August 06, 2003

Being Dead

In the previous post, I mentioned Being Dead, the National Book Critics Circle Award winner for 2000. I read it, hated it, then began treating reviews with a fair amount of skepticism because book critics clearly have no taste. I wrote my own review, which I add below for your reading pleasure:

I just finished Being Dead by Jim Crace. This book is about, well, being dead. And that's it. The characters aren't particularly interesting. Dialogue is almost nonexistent. There's barely a plot other than a thin story arc describing the events of the deceased's last day through the discovery of their bodies. The murderer disappears as stealthily as he arrives, and I got the impression that no one is intent on looking for him. In addition, the victims are so dull that you don't even feel sorry for them.

The only thing I can say in the book's defense is that it's beautifully written. But does it mean anything? A story isn't a great piece of literature just because an author is adept at composing prose. I'll give you an example of a piece I wrote myself:

I stepped onto the cool tile and was soon comforted by its smooth familiarity. Crossing the room, I paused as my face glided across the mirror. For a moment I contemplated the lines near my eyes which have become ever more pronounced with the passing years. The soft light above spread across the porcelain, hiding its stark whiteness under a warm blanket of ochre. Pools of darkness formed in the folds of my slacks as they slid down my thighs and calves to the floor below. Now seated, I was awash with contentment as the day's detritus flowed from my secret inner folds and splashed into the gaping mouth of the awaiting basin.
In case you missed it, I just took a beautifully written shit. And that's what this book is like. A beautifully written yet unsentimental account of murder, carrion, decay, rot, scavengers, and maggots. In particular, I didn't appreciate the numerous paragraphs discussing the dead man's penis from the moment of death to how the mortician will insert a plastic plug to keep his liquefying innards contained.

Maybe it's just me, but I don't get artsy crap like this. After I'm dead, I'll have eternity to contemplate its condition. In life, I'd much rather be entertained and amused. - May 31, 2001

Anyone else read it and think I'm dead wrong?



TrackBacks
 
http://www.bookblog.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/165
 
comments

I think it's worse than. I found the writing downright amateurish. (Cool ... comforted ... smooth ... glided ... soft ... contemplated ... warm ... pools ... slid ... All those ooooo sounds. Oooo. Aaaa. Ohhh. Mmmm. All those gentle, comforting, loving verbs. What is this, a spa massage? A velvet painting of a big-eyed puppy?)

Of course, I made the heinous mistake of writing a review to this effect on amazon.com some time ago, and got absolutely creamed. I learned my lesson. Amazon.com shoppers HATE bad reviews.

Thank you for hating this book as well. Too many people these days are blinded by pretty words and can't see that there's no substance behind them.

I must confess to not having read the book... however, after reading your beautifully written shit-taking piece, I can now say that I probably won't read the book.

Geat review, Mary!

I'm sorry I didn't come by bookblog sooner.

Chari, you are welcome any time! :)

I never finished the book. A high school history teacher once told me never to finish a book if I wasn't interested in any of the characters after page 30. There are too many other (better) books out there.

I grew tired of reading about skulls smashed in and blood dripping told at a painfully slow pace. Why I can read about shoelaces in Nicholson Baker's The Mezzanine (and have my attention held) but I can't read this, I don't know. I wondered recently if I should go back and try to re-read it, but... I don't think so now.

Amen, Amy.

post a comment














Comments on this site are moderated. If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by BookBlog before your comment will appear. Thanks for waiting.



 

Advertisements
 
 
Author:
Title:

Keyword:
Additional Features:
 First Edition
 Signed
 Dust Jacket
 Any Binding
 Hard Cover
 Soft Cover