BookBlog [dot net]: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, A Review

Main
Search This Site

« back to Freaky Deaky Cover Art
» forward to Gigglechick, Live at the Improv

Discussion Archives

Bel Canto
blindness
A Box of Matches
Bridge of Birds

a canticle for leibowitz
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Chronicle of a Death Foretold
A Confederacy of Dunces
confessions of an ugly stepsister
Coraline
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

descent into hell
The Dew Breaker
The Diamond Age
Doctor Zhivago
don quixote

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Fight Club
The Five People You Meet in Heaven
Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe

The Ghost Writer
good in bed

harry potter and the sorcerer's stone
A Home at the End of the World
House of Leaves

If on a Winter's Night a Traveler
invisible monsters

The Kite Runner

Life of Pi

memoirs of a geisha
Middlesex
Motherless Brooklyn
mysterious skin

Neverwhere
noir
Norwegian Wood

One for the Money

the poisonwood bible

revenge
Running with Scissors

The Secret Life of Bees
shopgirl
The Solitaire Mystery
The Stupidest Angel

Things Fall Apart
Thumbsucker
The Time Traveler's Wife
Troll

Veronika Decides to Die

The Wasp Factory
Watch Your Mouth
What is the What
A Wrinkle in Time
Wuthering Heights

July 19, 2005

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, A Review

I haven't seen Tim Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory yet and keep wanting to find the time to go, but I guess The Star-Ledger (Newark, NJ) didn't like it:

The star of the movie, though, remains Johnny Depp. And he soon becomes its biggest problem.

Say it isn't so!

This part of the review was a little confusing:

Add Depp's strangeness to it, and some overdone horrors (Veruca Salt is attacked by vicious squirrels, and thrown down an incinerator shaft) and it's easy to imagine little ones crying out for "Herbie: Fully Loaded" halfway through.

Um, in Roald Dahl's version, Veruca Salt is attacked by vicious squirrels and is thrown down an incinerator shaft. That's why there's a chapter called "The Nut Room." Or maybe this reviewer is in the same situation as me and also can't find his copy of the book.

Trackback Excerpt: Like any parent with deferred-parenting skills might do, I took my kids to see Charlie and the chocolate factory. Having seen the original 1971 version, I have to admit I was eager to see how a great kids story would......
[Read More]

comments

It pisses me off to read these movie reviews. READ the book people. THEN review the movie.

DUH.

Hi:

I'm not sure whether your site allows open comments. I have never commented before, but often visit to see what you're reading and what you have to say.

Dahl is one of my favorite childhood authors. I went to Charlie and the Chocolate Factory on opening night, then came home and read a few reviews. Many (and maybe most) compared the movie to Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory starring Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka, never mentioning that both movies are based on Roald Dahl's book! Hello!! Even more frustrating are reviews like the one you mentioned that critizise the new movie for not staying true to the original, thinking the original starred Gene Wilder, when this movie remains more true to the book than the earlier film.

If you liked the book, go see the movie. It is wonderful. Frankly, I think Dahl would be pleased with both films, but I prefer the newer version. The characters and story remain true to what Dahl wrote. I found Tim Burton's embellishments appropriate and madly funny. You will love the Oompa Loompas.

The new film far surpassed my expectations, although (mild spoiler ahead) I really disliked the ending. It's clear both films made changes because the original book doesn't have much character growth or much of a narrative arc, but I was rolling my eyes for most of the final five minutes.

Still, the stunning visuals, inspired casting, and near-flawless performance of Depp helped me forgive the screenwriter's finale.

hmmm, i'm in the same boat as Mary.
i haven't seen the movie yet. i want to soon though!!!

so far, i have only read two reviews about the new movie. the first review was in my local paper...and it was a bad review. they mostly said that johnny depp made the movie suck. (right...sarcasm right there) the second review...well, more of a concensus, was from RottenTomatoes.com. they gave it an 83% rating, which is really good! (i'm ususally comfortable with RT's ratings).

but alas, i must see for myself.

I've been hearing mostly good things about the movie and though I haven't read the book (yet) I'm planning on watching the movie this Saturday.

Agreed Jayme,

The new movie is much more faithful to the book then the orignal movie... But somehow Johnny's character ddn't do it for me, don't get me wrong, I love him, but I think he added a bit of a twist in the wrong direction to wonkas character.. anyways, go see it for yourself!

---
Public Domain Books: Online
http://www.PDBooksOnline.com