bookblog.net

 

Main
Search This Site

« back to Book Swapping
» forward to Power to the People

Discussion Archives
Bel Canto
blindness
bridge of birds
a canticle for leibowitz
charlie and the chocolate factory
chronicle of a death foretold
a confederacy of dunces
confessions of an ugly stepsister
coraline
the curious incident of the dog in the night-time
descent into hell
the diamond age
don quixote
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
fight club
the five people you meet in heaven
fried green tomatoes at the whistle stop cafe
the ghost writer
good in bed
harry potter and the sorcerer's stone
a home at the end of the world
house of leaves
if on a winter's night a traveler
invisible monsters
the kite runner
life of pi
memoirs of a geisha
middlesex
mysterious skin
Neverwhere
noir
norwegian wood
one for the money
the poisonwood bible
revenge
the secret life of bees
shopgirl
the solitaire mystery
the stupidest angel
thumbsucker
the time traveler's wife
troll
veronika decides to die
watch your mouth
a wrinkle in time

Monthly Archives
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002

 

October 06, 2006

Book Banning, Again

Typical. I wrote a post the other day dissing Banned Books Week, and then Edward Champion finds this article on a hearing to remove two graphic novels from a public library in Missouri. The titles in question are Blankets by Craig Thompson and Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic by Alison Bechdel.

I’m not really against having a Banned Books Week; I just don’t go for its overemphasis on challenges in schools. Parents should question what their children are taught and have every right to voice their opinions on required reading. Pointing fingers, as if their concerns are akin to book burning, can easily turn into a means of intimidating them out of speaking up. Isn’t fighting the suppression of ideas exactly what Banned Books Week all about?

But there is an enormous difference between a school and a public library, a place where adults should be allowed access to what they want to read.

Although Ed’s post focuses on the definition of pornography and whether or not the graphic novels’ challenger is qualified to determine the difference between art and the obscene, what’s gotten under my skin are several irrational jump-to-conclusions statements in the article:

  • "'We may as well purchase the porn shop down at the junction and move it to Eastwood. Some day this library will be drawing the same clientele,' Mills said."
  • "'I don't want seedy people coming into the library and moving into our community,' Aulgur said."
  • "'It's not a matter of censorship,' John Raines of Marshall said, 'but a matter of looking out for our kids.'"

I can already see the future headlines: PORN SHOP PATRONS GET THEIR FIX FOR FREE, SEEDY PEOPLE CHECK OUT GRAPHIC NOVELS THEN CHECK INTO TOWN, and COMICS DRAW KIDS TO A LIFE OF SERIAL MASTURBATION AND SEX.

Oh, please.

Looking out for kids should not necessitate taking books away from adults. Especially since most kids, including those in Marshall, Missouri, already know so, so much more about sex than you or I ever will. Our kids’ kids will know even more. Banning two graphic novels from a public library is not going to stop that train from rolling into town.



comments

re: banned books week

I've been working in public libraries for eleven years now. At the library system I work for, we have a policy of allowing access to all books and magazines to anyone who wants them. It is not our place, nor our right, to determine what is or isn't fit reading for children. That's part of a parent's job, not a librarian's or a library clerk's or any other library employee.

At our library system, the information concerning banned books week isn't "aimed" at school boards or parents who are afraid their kid is going to see something about sex. It is simply there to make people aware that books have been banned in the past, are banned in many places in the world today, and that there is a danger in that. The danger is that it erodes people's freedoms.

I don't want to get off onto a political diatribe here, but banning books can be just the tip of the iceberg. And as hard as it may be to believe, there are people who come into the library and are amazed that the banning of books takes place anywhere in this country. They are the ones our displays are "aimed" at. We feel it is important for people to know that it happens.

Exactly. If parents don't want their kids having certain books, they should keep track of what they read. But they shouldn't give public libraries a hard time about what books are available there. Parents should monitor their own children and not expect a librarian or society to do it for them.

And yet, many of these towns that don't want smutty books are MAJOR consumers of smutty tabloids, available in every grocery store. Should Piggly Wiggly be responsible for keeping impressionable youth from reading about Paris Hilton and Lindsey Lohan?

Oh, and wait -- do any of these watchdog parents have cable TV?

Smut is all a matter of taste.

Some parents also think society is supposed to do their jobs for them. They actually want to take the smutty thing away from everyone because they can't keep track of what their kids are doing.

I don't want to get off onto a political diatribe here, but banning books can be just the tip of the iceberg. And as hard as it may be to believe, there are people who come into the library and are amazed that the banning of books takes place anywhere in this country. They are the ones our displays are "aimed" at. We feel it is important for people to know that it happens.

AS you think?

 

Category Archives
About the Club
About the Site
About Us
in the Industry
in the News
on Other Sites
We Want to Read
We're Reading
We've Read
textbooks

Support BookBlog
 
Author:
Title:

Keyword:
Additional Features:
 First Edition
 Signed
 Dust Jacket
 Any Binding
 Hard Cover
 Soft Cover