Main
Search This Site

« back to Critical Mass of a Mess
» forward to Discussion: Remainder by Tom McCarthy

Discussion Archives
Bel Canto
blindness
A Box of Matches
Bridge of Birds

a canticle for leibowitz
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Chronicle of a Death Foretold
A Confederacy of Dunces
confessions of an ugly stepsister
Coraline
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

descent into hell
The Dew Breaker
The Diamond Age
Doctor Zhivago
don quixote

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Fight Club
The Five People You Meet in Heaven
Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe

The Ghost Writer
good in bed

harry potter and the sorcerer's stone
A Home at the End of the World
House of Leaves

If on a Winter's Night a Traveler
invisible monsters

The Kite Runner

Life of Pi

memoirs of a geisha
Middlesex
Motherless Brooklyn
mysterious skin

Neverwhere
noir
Norwegian Wood

One for the Money

the poisonwood bible

revenge
Running with Scissors

The Secret Life of Bees
shopgirl
The Solitaire Mystery
The Stupidest Angel

Things Fall Apart
Thumbsucker
The Time Traveler's Wife
Troll

Veronika Decides to Die

The Wasp Factory
Watch Your Mouth
What is the What
A Wrinkle in Time
Wuthering Heights

 

May 20, 2007

More of a Critical Mess

Yesterday, I left a comment on Critical Mass which was soon followed by several other people weighing in on the way the NBCC has been portraying itself on its blog. As of this morning, all of the comments on that thread have disappeared and there's no way to leave a new one.

I hope it's a technical glitch. If it isn't, then it's more confirmation of my thoughts from yesterday: "it appears as though they care more about expressing one-way opinions than engaging in dialogue, can't take our criticism, and have no regard for their site's audience." I can't help but feel censored and am thankful I have a forum for my opinions, even if Critical Mass finds them less valid than their own.

Here's a copy of the comment I left:

Although I'm sorry you've been the undeserving recipient of angry emails, I am frankly, as a blogger, tiring of what I read here. You say that what's posted does not represent the views of the NBCC, but this is the NBCC's blog. It represents your organization to the blogging world, whether or not the opinions expressed are held solely by each individual poster.

Besides being word play on your occupation, "critical mass" refers to the sum total of many things needed to fuel momentum. From what I read here, your momentum is headed toward alienation from the very people you need in your corner if you truly want to save newspaper book reviews.

Many of you are editors, and some editing here would do you good. The frequent vitriol against bloggers does not earn sympathy for your cause, especially since we likely comprise the majority of your readers. One reason often cited for the decline of book reviews in newspapers relates to them being out of touch with the books most people want to read. I'm inclined to believe it, considering how out of touch this blog is with its audience.

Although I wasn't paid for my opinion and have now self-published it in a lesser medium than print, I still think I have a right to it. Of course, those of you not reading this—since no one reads blogs—might think otherwise.

Update: The comment thread to the post mentioned above has reappeared. Whew.



TrackBacks
 
http://www.bookblog.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/491
 
comments

The War Against Bloggers has always been doubly deceitful: they must recognize that we aren't the enemy, but since there is no enemy where there needs to be an enemy, they make the not-enemy the enemy there needs to be.

For people who pride themselves on the superior powers of their intellect, it's almost as pathetic as it is dishonest.

You'll probably hate me for doing this but I read this article and thought of you: "Not Everybody's a Critic"

Courtesy of "Pages Turned". Enjoy!

Bdr, it's true that we aren't the enemy. I don't want to see newspaper reviews vanish, but the constant bashing doesn't make me want to help them out. I wish the NBCC would engage in more forward-thinking, rather than post opinions tearing down others in order to raise themselves.

Imani, oy. Such intentional elitism is astounding: "Criticism — and its humble cousin, reviewing — is not a democratic activity." Unfortunately, I can't wrap my busy blogger brain around the argument, so I'll have to give the article a thumbs down.

Whoops. I forgot that my unpaid and uncritical opinion doesn't "initiate intelligent dialogue about the work in question." Stupid blogger.

I don't think I'm alone in saying that I prefer bloggers' reviews of books over those of the so called "experts" affiliated with newspapers.

I think many bloggers (like myself) have less of a vested interest in the opinions of our readers, so we are able to be more honest in our assessments of the written word. I don't get paid to review, so anything I say about a book really is from the heart.

Newspapers are right to be afraid. Now that the internet is here to stay, they can't play the elitist ticket any longer. I can't think of a single newspaper reviewer that is any better than I or you or any of the myriad number of really good lit bloggers that I peruse out here in the webosphere.

That's quite interesting. I hope it gets sorted out.

post a comment














Comments on this site are moderated. If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by BookBlog before your comment will appear. Thanks for waiting.



 

Advertisements
 
 
Author:
Title:

Keyword:
Additional Features:
 First Edition
 Signed
 Dust Jacket
 Any Binding
 Hard Cover
 Soft Cover