Main
Search This Site

« back to Quirkology
» forward to Reading Vacation While on a Blogging Vacation

Discussion Archives
Bel Canto
blindness
A Box of Matches
Bridge of Birds

a canticle for leibowitz
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Chronicle of a Death Foretold
A Confederacy of Dunces
confessions of an ugly stepsister
Coraline
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

descent into hell
The Dew Breaker
The Diamond Age
Doctor Zhivago
don quixote

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Fight Club
The Five People You Meet in Heaven
Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe

The Ghost Writer
good in bed

harry potter and the sorcerer's stone
A Home at the End of the World
House of Leaves

If on a Winter's Night a Traveler
invisible monsters

The Kite Runner

Life of Pi

memoirs of a geisha
Middlesex
Motherless Brooklyn
mysterious skin

Neverwhere
noir
Norwegian Wood

One for the Money

the poisonwood bible

revenge
Running with Scissors

The Secret Life of Bees
shopgirl
The Solitaire Mystery
The Stupidest Angel

Things Fall Apart
Thumbsucker
The Time Traveler's Wife
Troll

Veronika Decides to Die

The Wasp Factory
Watch Your Mouth
What is the What
A Wrinkle in Time
Wuthering Heights

 

May 11, 2007

Others See Chuck Speak; I Wallow in Regret

Taking a departure from the usual link-and-run style of blogging, Frank Wilson of The Philadelphia Inquirer has written a meaty post about last night's Chuck Palahniuk and Elmore Leonard appearance. He writes:

The whole event was the literary equivalent of a rock concert. When Chuck announced that he was going to read one his more notorious stories, "Guts," the audience cheered, the way they would if a rock star said he was going to perform a legendary hit.

I kept thinking on the way home how newspapers are desperate to attract younger readers, but haven't a clue as to how popular this guy is with just the people they're looking for. Never have I had a greater sense of just how out of touch newspapers have become.

[Speaking of being out of touch, I wish Critical Mass would stop posting name-dropping lists. It's very nice to see lots of authors protesting the AJC's removal of their book editor. However, it'd be even nicer to read an homage to all the paid subscribers who have signed the petition, like #5377, "a subscriber to the AJC since 1970," or #5312 who writes, "There is no other way to get the regional book coverage. So if AJC doesn't have it, I will need to go back to subscribing to the New York Times."]

Back to Chuck. Here's another post about last night's Philly reading from a fan who cut class to attend:

Chuck spoke for 2 hours, he was definitely on something, his speech was slurred and he looked a touch unsteady, but it worked for him. He took questions from the crowd and when asked how zombie movies had influenced the rabies plague in his new book, he said he loved zombies. He said that when his friends watch boring movies like "The English Patient" or "Howard's End", they often say how the movie would be exponentially better with some of those fast moving zombies from the "Dawn of the Dead" remake.

And from the Cult forums, here's an account from the New York tour stop on Wednesday night:

You might have seen me, I was in the duct tape wedding dress. (Front row, huzzah. The perks of being early.) I got to talk to Chuck at about 3:30 and he gave me the slip for redeeming the wedding dress...prize...thing. (Of course, they gave me another during the readings, so now I have two. Ahem--scrapbook time!) Which, the only thing I know about the prize is that he told me it "would be too big to hang in a frame on my wall". Yeah, so, that doesn't narrow it down at all, but that's all I have. I never met him before, and was surprised how amazingly warm and friendly he was, not to mention how light and sincere his handshake was. Very personal.

I only have one regret, and that is--stupid me--I didn't ask to get my picture with him while we were talking. My brain was completely fried and I got entirely too nervous, popping my knuckles, turning red and saying really nonsensical things because my thought process just wasn't working.

I'm jealous. I should have forced myself out the door.



TrackBacks
 
http://www.bookblog.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/486
 
comments

Yeah, Wilson is exactly right: The newspapers are completely out of touch. Look at what's been happening at the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, where the Strib has done a complete shakeup of its writers and dropped James Lileks' column, telling him that they'll put him on the local beat, which is a complete waste of his talents. Anybody who reads The Bleat on a regular basis knows this. But they've decided to commit pulp hara-kiri. Idiots.

What's currently going on at all the papers is amazing. Although I gladly read news online, I'm surprised at how gung ho they all were to put their content on the Internet for free. I mean, did no one at any paper stop to think about what it might do to their subscriber numbers? And rather than go backwards (like offering online content only to subscribers) or come up with alternate ways to make money, their employees are the ones who are suffering and making sacrifices. It's truly despicable.

Well, if they have ads on their websites, then while it may be free to the readers, they still will have a revenue stream from it. It's all about the eyeballs.

The problem with putting some commment behind a subscriber wall is that such content loses its influence. Again, it's all about the eyeballs. Look at the TimesSelect situation. Heard anything from Maureen Dowd or any of the other New York Times columnists lately? Unless you have TimesSelect or read the dead-tree version of the paper, it's as if they've fallen off the face of the earth. Some folks may not think that's a bad thing...

If a tree falls in a forest and nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

Honestly, web advertising doesn't pay much (trust me) even when you do have a lot of visitors. For some newspapers, I bet the cost of maintaining a web site exceeds revenue from ads. Plus, with falling subscriber numbers, print ad revenue is probably also taking a serious hit.

From what I understand, The New York Times has a fairly stable base for the print version, which may have some relation to the TimesSelect subscriber wall. It's also a national newspaper and the gold standard; local dailies are the ones with all the revenue problems.

I subscribe to my local on a two-days-a-week plan, and I read it cover-to-cover. Although I have no idea what the future of newspapering will be, maybe Warren Buffett will come up with some ideas.

post a comment














Comments on this site are moderated. If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by BookBlog before your comment will appear. Thanks for waiting.



 

Advertisements
 
 
Author:
Title:

Keyword:
Additional Features:
 First Edition
 Signed
 Dust Jacket
 Any Binding
 Hard Cover
 Soft Cover