Main
Search This Site

« back to Paneling: "Save Our Book Reviews!"
» forward to In Chicago: "Bridges, Burning"

Discussion Archives
Bel Canto
blindness
A Box of Matches
Bridge of Birds

a canticle for leibowitz
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Chronicle of a Death Foretold
A Confederacy of Dunces
confessions of an ugly stepsister
Coraline
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

descent into hell
The Dew Breaker
The Diamond Age
Doctor Zhivago
don quixote

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Fight Club
The Five People You Meet in Heaven
Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe

The Ghost Writer
good in bed

harry potter and the sorcerer's stone
A Home at the End of the World
House of Leaves

If on a Winter's Night a Traveler
invisible monsters

The Kite Runner

Life of Pi

memoirs of a geisha
Middlesex
Motherless Brooklyn
mysterious skin

Neverwhere
noir
Norwegian Wood

One for the Money

the poisonwood bible

revenge
Running with Scissors

The Secret Life of Bees
shopgirl
The Solitaire Mystery
The Stupidest Angel

Things Fall Apart
Thumbsucker
The Time Traveler's Wife
Troll

Veronika Decides to Die

The Wasp Factory
Watch Your Mouth
What is the What
A Wrinkle in Time
Wuthering Heights

 

June 16, 2007

More on "Save Our Book Reviews!"

Now that I've had a few days to digest Wednesday's panel and more thoroughly look over my notes, I have a few additional thoughts.

When a book is reviewed in the newspaper, six forces go into play: writer, publisher, critic, newspaper, bookseller, reader. Each has its own agenda.

Writer - According to Hannah Tinti, writers want their books reviewed by as many different voices as possible. They do not want the same bad review to be passed around from paper to paper via the AP. As a result, lots of working critics at lots of different newspapers benefit the writer.

Publisher - Dan Simon mentioned the corporate value system in reference to the fact that the big houses publish the majority of books available today. They have to report to shareholders, so making money is more important than producing quality literature. From what I know, word of mouth and the backlist long tail are more profitable than anything else. Obviously, publishers will court anyone (including maggots) who are likely to flaunt their wares.

Critic - Each of the panelists, except John Freeman, mentioned the importance of placing a book within its niche since targeting sells. To him, the problem with writing reviews for niches (e.g., a title with local rather than national interest) is that they segregate discourse from a broad audience. Critics clearly want their reviews to be widely read and discussed; they are journalists, not salespeople.

Newspaper - It is unfortunate no one on the panel represented the business end of newspapers. Having once worked in a particular tower in Chicago, I can say this: newspapers, like the big publishing houses, are in the business of making money. When they think something doesn't earn, they will cut it loose—regardless of whether or not it serves the public or the greater good.

Bookseller - When I sold books to the trade, we operated on the idea that three factors drove retail sales: niche, store placement, and cover. I found it interesting when Sarah McNally said books without quotes on them don't sell no matter where she puts them in her store. Although I can't say for sure, my guess is blurbs from a respected publication (like The New York Times) or a well-known author (like James Patterson) move more inventory than ones from Joe Critic in The Unknown Tribune.

Reader - Presumably, everyone reading this blog also reads books. I'll leave it up to you to decide what your agenda is and where you fit into the grand scheme of the above. If you're willing to share, I'd love it if you'd leave a comment.



TrackBacks
 
http://www.bookblog.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/506
 
comments

I appreciate you analyzing each grade here. Primarily interesting is writers needing expansively ranging critiques.

I think Remainder though was inadequately plotted. Maybe I express the requirement for multiple views--Mr McCarthy agrees no doubt!

Thank you and I appreciate your analysis on style regarding Remainder. I quite noted the perspicuity the narrative acquired when I appreciated his narrative finestly.

Brian, Tinti's point makes sense about fewer reviews hurting writers. Freeman had also mentioned that when the reviewing system breaks down, writers are less likely to produce quality work because they "get depressed." Although I don't think depression has anything to do with it, fewer quality reviews of quality books is certainly happening. However, I believe we're in an era when mediocrity has become the standard, so commercial success is more of a measure than critical success.

post a comment














Comments on this site are moderated. If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by BookBlog before your comment will appear. Thanks for waiting.



 

Advertisements
 
 
Author:
Title:

Keyword:
Additional Features:
 First Edition
 Signed
 Dust Jacket
 Any Binding
 Hard Cover
 Soft Cover